It's hard to reflect back on the movie when I feel as if some of my initial reactions have been tainted since I heard the views of my classmates. I only liked Mookie. I saw too many flaws in the other characters. Even though Da Mayor saved a life and comforted Mother Sister, I didn't like him because he was a drunk. The Italians frustrated me and the group of kids annoyed me. I find it funny that the character I connected with the most was neither white nor female. My opinions seem as if I watched the movie color blind. To me, this seemed like a Shakespearian tradgedy. Takes place in a short amount of time, more than one side is fighting and the characters demonstrate different view points. And even though the end is sad and worrying, some part of the story seems to be wrapped up. I also found similarities with Mookie and Jade and Romeo and Juliet. They're from two different races but have a romance, even though the people outside wouldn't necessarily condone it. I also felt that the death of Radio Rajim at the end of the movie goes out as a message, similarly to the ending monologue of Romeo and Juliet.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Do The Right Thing vs. "How Bigger Was Born"
Both Do The Right Thing and "How Bigger Was Born" bring to life all forms of the spectrum in regards to black pride. "How Bigger Was Born" detailed a number of Biggers who all acted differently about a similar subject, which was violence and thought-process. There were the extreme Biggers who faught and became enraged while there were also Biggers who bottled up emotions and pride but still held the same perspective. When all of these sides were combined, they all compelled some sort of an action. This is best said when Wright writes, "The process was like a swinging pendulum, each to and fro motion throwing up its tiny bit of meaning and significance, each storke helping to develop the dim negative which had been implanted in my mind in the South." (442) Because of the constant clash of cultures, they all affected each other and encouraged some sort of action to occur. This was prevalent in both the book and the movie. Also, in Do The Right Thing Spike Lee had characters who could show every perspective to black pride. There were the violent ones who took action, like Buggin' Out and Radio Rajim. There were the static ones in the middle like Mookie and then there were the ones who could care less about violence, like Da Mayor and Senor Love Daddy. Do The Right Thing showed how everyone thought that their actions were the right thing because they were all different people with varying opinions.
Monday, January 3, 2011
Two Societies - Document Four Response
Let's who-what-when-where-why this piece. The majority of the writing was selections from interviews, mainly one involving Linda Bryant Hill. She shared her perspective on the success of Dr. King's Chicago marches and also gave a detailed account of her feelings on the cancelation of the Cicero march. Cicero was a community of 15,000 whites who still felt hatred towards blacks. When the six or seven people who showed up for the march actually started to move, the heckling was so bad that it didn't progress. The lesson that we can take from this is that sometimes a leader is more ready to move forward than a community.
The question that I chose to answer is:
Hall's definition of community people can be roughly interpreted as a group of people who share opinions and use their large number of inhabitants to their advantage to get what they want. Cicero was different than Chicago because it was a more condensed group of people who belonged to the same race whereas Chicago was more mixed in its skin color and beliefs. Chicago could be considered more of a movement people because there are more supporters for both and even other sides of the civil right movement. The reason that Cicero is so different than this is because their small population of whites has no other influences from within and therefore their values will remain static and relentless.
Annnnnd scene.
The question that I chose to answer is:
4. Hall explains that the Cicero march was not made up of movement people, but was made up of “community people”. What does she mean? How did the differences manifest themselves in Cicero?
Hall's definition of community people can be roughly interpreted as a group of people who share opinions and use their large number of inhabitants to their advantage to get what they want. Cicero was different than Chicago because it was a more condensed group of people who belonged to the same race whereas Chicago was more mixed in its skin color and beliefs. Chicago could be considered more of a movement people because there are more supporters for both and even other sides of the civil right movement. The reason that Cicero is so different than this is because their small population of whites has no other influences from within and therefore their values will remain static and relentless.
Annnnnd scene.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)